The benchmark results show that the Quad-core Intel Core i7 6820HQ 2.9GHz mean-machine is yet again beaten by the 2015 model. The line-up doesn’t change much from single-core to multi-core, with the exception that the 13-inch model drops out of the list. Even activating all available processor cores during the benchmarking tests didn’t do Apple’s new flagship model any favours. If you came here looking for some high-performance multi-core drama, you’ve come to the wrong place. I’m afraid you will be disappointed again. After-all, macOS is sold as a highly-optimised operating system designed to squeeze every last drop of power out of your machine for the perfect computing experience. Since Apple’s hardware is so tightly integrated with the software I tried to force the argument that the high-end MacBook would perform better when all four processor cores were in use. The HQ in the processor’s model name tells us that this processor is built with high-performance graphics and features 4 cores (quad core). This particular model features the maxed out 16GB of memory and a high-speed m2 SSD hard-drive as well as the 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 4980HQ processing chip. ![]() The single core results have the 15-inch retina MacBook Pro 2015 leading the way with just under 4300 Geekbench points. A significant majority of these videos show the 2015 model outpacing the newer TouchBar model unveiled a month ago. The most popular comparison seems to be a MacBook Pro 2015 i7 with 16GB of memory vs a MacBook Pro 2016 i7 with 16GB of memory. YouTubers have also been posting videos running demanding tasks on machines side-by-side. But, these are early results which may not accurately reflect the performance of Apple’s new line-up. It seems as though the MacBook Pro Late 2016 is slower than the older generations. It won't however, impress you running next to a Core i7 MacBook Pro.Īpples to Oranges? We are comparing an iOS mobile device with 4G of RAM running iOS apps to an OS X device with 8G to 16G of RAM running OS X apps.Early benchmark scores for the new 2016 MacBook are beginning to surface online. However, if CPU crunching is your need, it could be a substitute for the 12" MacBook. If graphic speed is your passion, at least if our limited testing with and OpenGL benchmark, it could be argued that the iPad Pro matches or exceeds the performance of any Apple laptop. Shockingly, the iPad Pro's framerate for the Manhattan OpenGL animation is faster than the fastest 15" MacBook Pro with M370X GPU! And the framerate for the T-Rex OpenGL animation is almost as fast. (The top 2.8GHz MacBook Pro 15" Quad-Core i7 2.8GHz was not included but, in case you are curious, it's Geekbench Multi-Core score was 15165.) The Multi-Core Score is essentially the same as the top 12" MacBook with 1.3GHz Core M but slower than the MacBook Air and 13" MacBook Pro. The Geekbench 3 Single-Core Score for the iPad Pro beats the fastest 12" MacBook Retina but scores behind the two MacBook Pros - which is as it should be. IPhone 6s Plus = iPhone 6s Plus with A9 chip ( HIGHER number means FASTER.)ġ5" MacBook Pro = Mid 2015 Macbook Pro 15" with 2.8GHz Core i7 and AMD Radeon R9 M370Xġ3" MacBook Pro = Early 2015 Macbook Pro 13" with 3.1GHz Core i7 and Intel HD Graphics 6100ġ3" MacBook Air = Early 2015 Macbook Pro 13" with 2.2 GHz Core i7 and Intel HD Graphics 6000ġ2" MacBook = Early 2015 MacBook Retina 12" with 1.2GHz or 1.3GHz Core M and Intel HD Graphics 5300 ![]() We ran the Manhattan and T-Rex animations off screen at 1080p in all cases. GFXBench 3 measures the OpenGL performance of both iOS and OS X devices.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |